Genesis 37:1–50:26
Sources
Reformed ConsensusReformation Study BibleCalvin (1560)Geneva Bible Notes (1599)John Trapp (1647)John Gill (1748)Matthew Henry (1714)Jamieson-Fausset-BrownBarnes (1832)MacLaren (1910)Cross-References (TSK)Reformed Consensus
The Joseph narrative (Genesis 37–50) stands as one of Scripture's most sustained demonstrations of divine providence, wherein God sovereignly orchestrates human sin, suffering, and circumstance to accomplish His covenant purposes without becoming the author of evil — a truth Calvin found so luminous here that he called Providence "the mother of all virtues." Joseph's brothers intended his sale into Egypt for destruction, yet the text climaxes in his own confession that God meant it for good (50:20), vindicating the Reformed insistence that God's eternal decree works not alongside but through secondary causes, including wicked ones. Joseph himself functions typologically as a figure of Christ — beloved son, unjustly condemned, cast into a pit and raised to glory, from whom bread of life flows to both Jew and Gentile — a reading Calvin, Geerhardus Vos, and Edmund Clowney each develop as organic to the text's canonical intention rather than eisegetical imposition. Throughout the narrative the Abrahamic covenant hangs by a thread humanly speaking, yet God's faithfulness to His electing promise preserves the line of Judah (ch. 38) and positions Israel for the sojourn that will culminate in Exodus and Sinai. Reformed readers are thus called to rest in the God who governs all things — even family betrayal, false accusation, and forgotten mercies — for the sake of His people and the glory of His name.
Reformation Study Bible
the generations of Jacob. See note 2:4. sons of Bilhah and Zilpah. Dan, Naphtali, Gad, and Asher (30:4-13). 37:3 loved. Parental favoritism again promoted family discord, decep- tion, and the disappearance of the preferred son, but God graciously used it to achieve His. good purpose (cf. 25-28). old age. See 30-22-24. robe of many colors. A sign of Josephs preferential status (cf. 2 Sam. 13:18), and a galling reminder to Joseph's brothers of their father's favoritism. The exact nature of the coat is uncertain. The rendering “of Some suggest that the Hebrew means a “long coat with sleeves” | could not speak peacefully to him. Or, “could not greet him with peace” The greeting, or salutation, was a crucial element of ancient eti- quette (cf. 1 Sam. 25:6). Such a failure to extend the greeting indicated the depth of their animosity. | dream. As in certain other Genesis narratives, the key to the Joseph story is given in an opening revelation (cf. 12:1-3; 25:22, 23). This prophetic drearn shows that God's sovereign purpose lay behind all the events of the narrative (45:5-8), See note 20:3. | bowed down. See 42:6; 43:26; 44:14. 3728 reign. Their rhetorical question was later answered when Joseph came to rule “over all the land of Egypt” (41:43) and then over the covenant family living in Egypt. Joseph's status as head of the covenant family was confirmed when he received “the birthright” from his father Jacob (1 Chr, 5:2; cf Deut. 33:16). | another dream. The reiteration of the theme in Joseph's second dream, like the similar repetition in Pharaoh's dreams (41:1-7), shows that the matter was determined by God and would quickly come to pass (41:32). | mother. Probably a reference to Joseph's stepmother Leah; his mother Rachel had earlier died in childbirth (35:16-20). | kept the saying in mind. This statement perhaps anticipates Jacob's later decision to give Joseph the birthright and double portion (v. 8 note; 48:5; 6). | wandering in the fields. Because of this divinely ordained delay the Ishmaelites arrived at just the right time (vv. 21-28). | Reuben... rescued him. As the eldest brother (29:32), Reuben assumed leadership in Jacob's absence and was responsible for the safe- ty of his brothers (vv. 29, 30). } | they sat down to eat. The brothers later acknowledged the heart- lessness of their behavior (42:21). Ishmaelites. These traders are also identified as Midianites (v. 28). Both groups were descended from Abraham and had no doubt intermarried (25:2, 12). | sell him. Note the later prohibition in the Mosaic law against kid- napping (Ex. 21:16; Deut. 24:7). 37:28 twenty shekels, See Lev, 27:5. | where shall Igo. Under such circumstances, Reuben dreaded returning to his father, to whom he must give an account (v, 21 note), | Note the irony of these verses. Having deceived his father Isaac with goat skins (27:9) and with Esau’s clothing (27:27), Jacob here is deceived by goat's blood on his son’s clothes. Joseph Becomes a Slave in Egypt. Joseph followed his shepherd brothers from Hebron to Dothan, where they sold him to a caravan of Ishmaelites en route to Egypt. Mediterranean Sea Sea. of > \/Chinnereth a x, Dothan Ee =\shechem © f (GILEAD Bethel *Hebron Lahat Sea NEGEB To Egypt © 1996 Thomas Nelson, Inc. | Potiphar. This Egyptian name means, “he whom [the sun god] Ra has given.’ | Judah went down. From Hebron in the hill country to the lowlands (35:27). The family further degenerates by disloyalty. Adullamite. An inhabitant of the royal Canaanite city of Adullam (Josh. 12:15). | The shattered covenant family began to intermarry with the cursed Canaanites and risked the loss of their distinctive identity (34:1-31 note). God met this threat by sending Joseph ahead of them into Egypt where they were to be segregated (43:32; 46:34). There He preserved them until they had become a great nation and the iniquity of the Amorite was full (15:13-16). That the bizarre episode of Judah and Tamar should contribute to the genealogy of Jesus Christ is a vivid demonstration of God’s grace (Matt. 1:3-16 note). | Canaanite. See 9:25, 26 and notes. took her. See 24:3; 26:34, 35 and notes. | Chezib. A town near Adullam (v. 1 note). The mention of this Canaanite town, the name of which means “deceptive,’ underscores the theme of deception in the story of Jacob and his family. | raise up offspring for your brother. The first reference in Scripture to the widespread ancient custom of levirate marriage, whereby the brother of a deceased man (who lacked a heir) was expected to marry the widow. The offspring were considered children and heirs of the deceased, See note Deut. 25:5, | so as not to give offspring to his brother, Because the deceased Er was the firstborn, his heir would have inherited his position of family leadership and double portion (37:11 note). Desiring the place of first- born for himself, second-born Onan (v. 4) had intercourse with Tamar but prevented conception of a child. In so doing he was unfair to both his deceased brother and Tamar. | for he feared. Failing to perceive God's judgment.on his folly and on his wicked sons, Judah superstitiously regarded Tamar as a wife who brings misfortune. Because Judah was not about to risk the life of his third son, Tamar's future (which depended on having offspring) was bleak. | to shear his sheep. Judah departed with his Canaanite friend Hirah (v. 1) to attend the sheep-shearing, an event marked by a great feast. This provided Tamar with an opportunity to effect her plan. | garments. Once again clothing plays a part in deception (37:31-33 note). | Your signet and your cord. A cylinder seal, worn on a cord around the neck, was the insignia of a prominent man. He signed con- tracts by rolling the seal over the clay on which the contract was etched. | prostitute. Out of deference to Judah, his friend here used a more respectable term meaning “shrine prostitute” (a different Hebrew word is translated “prostitue” in v, 15). Cultic prostitution was integral to the Canaanite fertility religions, and was later a persistent snare to Israel (Deut. 23:17; 1 Kin. 14:24 text note; 2 Kin. 23:7 text note). | burned. A punishment later codified in the Mosaic law for a priest's daughter who prostituted herself (Lev, 21:9; cf, Deut. 22:21). | more righteous than I. Though she played on Judah's vice, Tamar was commended for her daring ruse to redress Judah's wrong and build up her family. Thus she became a heroine in Israel (Ruth 4:12). did not know her again. fo do so would have made him guilty of incest. | Another notable birth of twins where the identity of the first- born is crucial to the story (cf. 25:21-34). Having identified one child as the firstborn with a thread, the midwife is surprised when the other twin is born first. | Perez. Named for the circumstance of his unusual birth (text note), Perez becomes part of the messianic line (Ruth 4:18-22; Matt. 1:1-6; Luke 3:33). | Potiphar. See note 37:36. Ishmaelites. See note 37:25. | The narrative returns to Joseph in Egypt, where he survives a succession of injustices and is advanced because “the LorD was with him" (wy. 2, 23). God orchestrates an astonishing chain of events that move unerringly to save His people (Ps. 105:16-22). Joseph's initial privi- lege in Potiphar’s house (vv. 2-6; cf. 47:6), his affliction and imprisonment (v. 20; cf. Ex. 1:8-14), and his deliverance (v. 21; 41:37-45; cf. Ex. 3:21; 12:31-42) prefigure the later experience of Israel as a whole in Egypt. See Note 37:2-50:26. | The Lorp was with Joseph. This repeated formula provides the the- ological theme of the story (wv. 3, 21, 23), and the link between Joseph and the patriarchs (28:15; cf. Acts 7:9). God's beneficent presence was experienced even in slavery, outside the land of blessing. | the Lor blessed the Egyptian’s house. Once again the elect line isa means of blessing to those outside the covenant (12:3 note; 14:13, 24 and notes). | the food he ate. Probably a figure of speech for his private affairs, | sin against God. Adultery was considered a great sin in the ancient Near East (20:9 and note), but Joseph was particularly conscious that he lived in the presence of God (cf. 2 Sam. 12:13; Ps. 51:4). | a Hebrew, See note 14:13; 41:12; 43:32. | Though Potiphar’s anger may have initially been directed at Joseph, his subsequent action indicates that he doubted his wife's accu- sation. Attempted rape of the master’s wife by a slave would probably have earned a death sentence, but Joseph's punishment (confinement with the king's prisoners) was relatively mild. | gave him favor. God similarly commended the Israelites to the Egyptians before the Exodus (Ex. 3:21; 11:3; 12:36). | custody. They were awaiting Pharaoh's sentence. | dreams. See notes 20:3 and 37:9, The three sets of dreams, to Joseph (37:5-11), to the cupbearer and baker (ch. 40), and to Pharaoh (ch. 41), show God's sovereign control (41:28). no one to interpret. Dreams were valued in the ancient Near East as a means of discerning the future; professional dream interpreters were often employed by royal courts. interpretations belong to God. Joseph corrects the pagan beliefs of the Egyptian prisoners by acknowledging that God alone is the source of reliable interpretation, and that He bestows the gift of interpretation as He pleases (41:16; Dan, 2:24-49), tell them to me. Joseph recognized himself as a prophet (37:5-11). | lift up your head. A Hebrew idiom often meaning “restore to honor" or “release” (2 Kin. 25:27; Ps. 24:7), Here it may refer more partic- ularly to a ritual audience with Pharaoh in which the servant is singled out for special attention (v. 20). Note the pun in v. 19, where a slight vari- ation in the Hebrew gives the meaning ‘lift off your head” (perhaps a ref- erence to execution by decapitation). | the pit. An exaggerated description reflecting the frustrated pris- oner's point of view. Joseph's place of confinement with the king's pris- oners was not excessively miserable (39:19-23 and notes). | on my head. Ancient Egyptian art portrayed a baker carrying a basket on his head. | lifted up the head. See note on v. 13. | he hanged the chief baker. Not a reference to hanging as a method of execution, but to the public display of the corpse after death (v. 13 note; Deut. 21:22 note). | God exalted faithful Joseph over all Egypt by giving him super- natural wisdom: the ability to interpret dreams (v. 16) and skill in politi- cal economy and statesmanship (wv. 33, 38). Joseph prefigured Moses at the founding of Israel, and Daniel at the end of Israel's monarchy. All three were oppressed captives who came to power in a hostile land by pitting God's wisdom against the wise of this world, displaying the superiority of God's wisdom and His rule over the nations. They prefig- ure Jesus Christ, the incarnate Wisdom of God (1 Cor. 1:30; Col. 2:3), who was raised from the dead to rule the world (1 Cor. 1:18-2:16; Rev. 12:1-5). | dreamed. People of the ancient Near East typically viewed kings as chosen representatives of the gods. Royal dreams were seen as particu- larly significant (40:8 and notes). : the Nile. The source of Egypt's fertility. | magicians. Like many other ancient rulers, the Egyptian pharaohs retained sorcerers, dream interpreters, and wise men (40:8 note; Ex. 7:11; Dan. 2:2) for counsel in important matters, ; none who could interpret. See 40:8 and note. | Hebrew. See 14:13 and note; 39:14; 43:32. | shaved ... and changed his clothes. Unlike most ancient Near Eastern men (including the Hebrews), Egyptians were normally clean shaven. It would have been inappropriate for Joseph to appear before the king in prison rags (cf. 2 Kin. 25:29). | It is not in me; God will give. See note 40:8; cf. 2 Cor. 3:5. | God has revealed to Pharaoh. Both the dream and its interpre- tation were from God (40:8 and note). Joseph was inspired by God; he did not act as a magician. Neither Pharaoh nor his officials were in con- trol; God and His servant were in charge, as they would be centuries later in the time of Moses (Ex. 7:1-5). | the doubling of Pharaoh's dream. See note 37:9. | Spirit of God. Joseph pointed to God's action in giving the dream (v. 16), and Pharaoh acknowledged God's power at work in Joseph (41:1-57 note). | none so discerning and wise as you. Joseph had just defeated Egypt's best wise men (cf. Ex. 8:18; Dan. 2:10, 27, 28). | Joseph's installation as viceroy over Egypt consisted of a pub- lic act of installation (vv, 41-44), the conferring of anew name (v. 45), and the elevation to nobility by marriage (v. 46). | set you over all the land. Joseph, who had been faithful in little (39:4, 22), was put in charge of much (cf, Luke 16:10; 19:17), | Zaphenath-paneah. Joseph's role in Egypt was like that of Daniel in Babylon: both accepted pagan names without ba a pagan reli- gion (Dan. 1:7). Asenath. Her name means “belongs to [the goddess] Neit.” Potiphera. Probably a variant spelling of Potiphar (37:36 note). On. Called Heliopolis in Greek, this city was a center for the worship of the sun god Ra (Jer. 43:13 text note); its high priest was one of the most prominent in ancient Egypt. | thirty years, Joseph had risen from slavery to become the king's second-in-command in a mere thirteen years (37:2). | See text notes. As the names of his sons indicate, Joseph was ever mindful of God's hand upon him. The first commemorates God's preservation through great hardship (v. 51), the second memorializes the divine favor with echoes of the Abrahamic blessing (v. 52; cf. 17:6, 20; 28:3; 48:4; cf. Ps. 105:23, 24). | all the earth. The temporal salvation (from starvation) of the known world depended on one descendant of the patriarchs (12:3; 39:5 and notes). In mediating this blessing, Joseph prefigures the work of Christ (1 John 2:2), See note 37:2-50:26. | Joseph used the providential famine and his authority to help reconcile the shattered family, By confronting them with. life and death (vv. 18, 20) he awakened their consciences to confess their guilt (vv. 21-24) and to protect Benjamin from harm (v. 37; 43:8, 9; 44:18-34). See note on chs. 43-45. | grain for sale in Egypt. See 12:10; 26:1, 2. | did not send Benjamin. Joseph's full brother had taken his place in his father's affections (37:3 and notes). The brothers’ treatment of him and of their father would indicate whether there had been a spiritual change in them. | bowed. To preserve their lives they unwittingly fulfilled Joseph's dream (37:5 and note). | like strangers . . . spoke roughly. As the rest of the narrative shows, Joseph was acting to ascertain his brothers’ attitudes and to heal the breach between him and his brothers. A quick pardon would not have led to true repentance and spiritual healing within the family. | they did not recognize him. Joseph had grown from a boy of sev- enteen to a man of almost forty (41:46, 47, 54; 45:6 note). He had the appearance of an august Egyptian official (41:14, 41-43) and used an interpreter (v. 23). | sons of one man. They were a family unit, not spies of a nation bent on war (cf. Num. 13:2). | you have come to see. This interrogation, with its repeated accu- sations (cf. v. 9), was necessary for the ruse and to extract information out of them so that Joseph could take his next step (43:7). | they said. The brothers no doubt thought the added details strengthened their credibility. | by the life of Pharaoh. The ancients swore solemn oaths by the life of the king or name of a deity (2 Sam, 15:21; Deut, 6:13 note). | Joseph's presentation of a choice—life or death—had the desired effect (v. 21), | | fear God, Joseph assured the brothers that he would deal hon- estly with them (20:11 note). | In truth we are guilty. Though falsely accused of spying, they saw the Egyptian as the tool of God's higher justice, matching their punish- ment with their real crime against Joseph. we did not listen. Their consciences awakened, the brothers’ heartless behavior came back to haunt them (37:25 and note). | he... wept. With their confession of guilt, reconciliation was pos- sible. | God has done. The first explicit mention of God by the brothers; they saw the hand of God at work behind their frightful circumstances (wv. 21, 22). | you shall trade in the land. In order not to distress their aged father further, they changed Joseph's threat of death (vv. 18, 20) to a promise of economic opportunity. | 1 Hebrew El Shaddai | Kill my two sons. Jacob did not accept Reuben's ill-considered proposal. Only the threat of starvation coupled with Judah's assurances would change his mind (43:1-14). | Joseph's ruse-had already begun to move his brothers from indifference to integrity and loyalty toward one another (42:21, 22). This change is further manifested in Judah's offer of himself as surety (43:9) and in his offer to sacrifice himself in Benjamin's stead (44:33). Finally, Joseph makes himself known to his brothers and, seeing their sins in the light of God's purpose, he forgives them (ch. 45). | Through Joseph, the merciful (v. 14), providing (v. 23), and gra- cious (v. 29) God of the fathers begins to bring peace to the shattered family (vv. 23, 26-28). See note on ch. 42, | Judah. Another brother had to step forward after Jacob's definitive refusal to Reuben (42:37, 38; cf. 49:3, 4). With his leadership rebuffed, Reuben is henceforth eclipsed by Joseph (who assumes the firstborn’s privileges, 37:8 note) and by Judah (who here takes Reuben’s place of responsibility for the eleven brothers and whose royal tribe was to pro- duce the Messiah, vv. 8, 9; 49:10). | live and not die. A reference to the severe famine (v. 1) that also recalls Joseph's threat (42:18-20, 34 and note). | a present, See note 32:13. 43:14 God Almighty. See note 17:1. | bowed down. See 37:5-11. At their first meeting they bowed in submission (42:6); here they bowed in homage with tribute in hand (v. 28; cf. Matt. 2:11). | God be gracious. Joseph reserved a special greeting for his beloved full-brother Benjamin (cf. Num. 6:25; Rom. 1:7). | Hebrews. See 14:13 and note; 39:14; 41:12. an abomination to the Egyptians. As Palestinian shepherds, the Hebrews followed different dietary practices and slaughtered for food animals that were sacred to the Egyptians (46:34 and note). Such cus- toms served the divine purpose by isolating the Israelites in the land of Goshen and preventing their assimilation into the pagan Egyptian cul- ture (38:1-30 note). j | amazement, The assigned seating of the brothers (in order of their birth) understandably amazed them. | Benjamin's . . . five times as much. This display of favoritism toward Benjamin (v. 29 note; cf. 37:3-11) was designed to test the broth- ers for jealousy. Their behavior (they drank and were merry") indicated that their change of heart was real. | put my cup. Joseph was putting the brothers to the final test of family fidelity. sack of the youngest. The original crime pertained to Joseph, Rachel's son and Jacob's favorite, and the brothers selling him into slavery in Egypt. To test the brothers, Joseph brilliantly created a situation where Rachel's other son (and Jacob's favorite), Benjamin, was also threatened with slavery in Egypt. | practices divination. Hydromancy, a form of ancient Near Eastern divination, made use of vessels of water. Objects or liquids put in the water generated patterns that were thought to reveal the future. This description and Joseph's statement in v, 15 do not indicate that he actu- ally practiced pagan divination; this description was necessary to the ruse and identified the silver cup as a treasured possession (cf, 42:7, 12). Joseph received revelation from God alone (40:8 and note; 41:16). | shall be my servant. Joseph’s modification of the brothers’ offer (v. 9) was necessary: he was testing their attitude toward making Benjamin a slave (v. 17 and note). | they tore their clothes. This display of extreme distress demon- strated their affection for both father and brother. | fell before him. Now they bowed before Joseph asking for mercy (43:26 note). | divination. See note on v. 5. | found out the guilt of your servants. Judah saw the impending penalty as punishment for their treatment of Joseph (42:21 and note), | man... shall be my servant. The stage for the great test was set (v. 2 note). Would they show compassion on their father and loyalty to Joseph's brother? | Judah. Representing the brothers (43:3 note). | instead of the boy. Here is a Judah very different from the one who sold his brother into slavery (37:26, 27), Judah's self-sacrificing love prefigures the vicarious atonement of Christ who by His voluntary suf- fering healed the breach between God and humans. | see the evil. See 37:34, 35. | In this narrative of forgiveness and reconciliation, Joseph pre- sents a model of submission to God's eternal and benevolent purpose (vv. 5-8). All the evil done to him by his brothers was only part of God's secret plan designed for the good, not only of Joseph, but of his wicked brothers as well. We learn that “all things work together" to accomplish God's excellent purpose (Rom. 8:28), not only for us who presently “love God," but for the “great multitude” that will comprise the everlasting city (Rev. 7:9). | These verses, with Joseph’s repeated affirmation “God sent me” (vv. 5, 7, 8), form the theological heart of the Joseph narrative (cf. 50:19-21; Acts 7:9-14). God oversees the course of human action to achieve His good and set purpose (Acts 2:23; 4:28). | donot... angry with yourselves. Joseph directed their gaze away from their sins to God's grace (50:19). | these two years. Joseph was thirty-nine years old at this time (41:46; 42:8 note). | remnant. Joseph's use of this term indicates his strong faith, tested by hard experience, in the faithfulness of God to His covenant promises. Out of this small endangered group a great nation would be built (12:1-3; 17:7). The prophets would later use this term in affirming that even in trying circumstances God would always preserve a people for Himself (Is. 10:20; 37:30-32; Mic. 2:12, 13). | it was not you... but God. Without excusing their sin, for which repentance was necessary (42:4 note), Joseph encourages the now con- trite sinners to rejoice in God's sovereign and gracious overruling of their evil intentions. | land of Goshen. A region in northeastern Egypt near the Wadi Tumilat in the Nile Delta. This fertile region provided ample grazing for their flocks (v. 18; 47:4, 6). | a change of clothes, In striking contrast to when the brothers stripped Joseph of his tunic (37:23). | Do not quarrel. The brothers were not to quarrel among one another, particularly over responsibility for their crime against Joseph, and how to explain it to their father. | This closing section of the “generations of Jacob" (37:2) provides a transition to the Book of Exodus (Introduction: Characteristics and Themes). | offered sacrifices. Beersheba was the place of worship for Abraham (21:32, 33), Isaac (26:23-25), and Jacob (28:10-15). | God spoke. Once again, upon Jacob's departure from the Promised Land, God repeated His promise to be with him and to bring the people back (28:15). visions of the night. The patriarchs functioned from time to time as prophets (12:7; 15:1; 18:17; 20:7 and notes). No visions to Jacob's twelve sons regarding the covenant promises of seed and land are recorded. | lam... the God. God repeated His assuring promises to Isaac (26:24) and Jacob (28:13-15), | will make you into a great nation. An elaboration of the covenant promise to Abraham (12:2; 15:13, 14; 18:18; cf. Ex. 1:7). | Joseph's hand shall close your eyes. A word of comfort for the aged Jacob; he would die peacefully in Joseph's presence (50:1; cf. 15:15). | This catalog of sons closes the patriarchal period. in Canaan and forms a transition to the Exodus from Egypt (Ex. 1:1-7). The list includes the sons and grandsons of Jacob (some of whom were born in Egypt) through his various wives and concubines, although his daughters, except for Dinah (v. 15) and Serah (v. 17), are omitted. Thus the list is designed to culminate in the significant number seventy (v. 27 note) to show both God's blessing on the family and to anticipate their further expansion into a great nation. | who came into Egypt. This list includes the sons of,Benjamin, who were probably born in Egypt (vv..21, 27), just as the catalog of those born in Paddan-aram (35:23-26) included Benjamin, who was obviously born in Canaan (35:26 note). The offspring were viewed as present in their par- ents (cf. Heb. 7:9, 10). | Ohad. Perhaps an inadvertent scribal addition, this name is omit- ted in Num. 26:12 and.1 Chr. 4:24. | Paddan-aram. See note 25:20. | sixty-six. The total of thirty-three (v. 15 and note), sixteen (v. 18), fourteen (v. 22), and seven (v. 25) comes to seventy. The figure of sixty-six persons probably reflects the omission of Er and Onan (v. 12) and Ephraim and Manasseh (vv. 20, 27). | seventy. The covenant family is represented by the symbolic number seventy (vv. 8-27 note), signifying a large and complete number (cf. ch. 10 note; Ex. 24:1; Ps. 90:10). In this group of seventy, the emerging nation of Israel was comprehended. The Septuagint (Greek Old Testament) adds five sons and grandsons of Manasseh and Ephraim at v. 20 and gives a total of seventy-five, a reading followed by Stephen in Acts 7:14. Such variations occasionally occur in the Greek Old Testament, and we don't always have the infor- mation necessary to explain them. | Through Joseph's wisdom God preserved Israel in Goshen, both physically, by providing food and land (45:10 note), and spiritually, by providing for their isolation from the pagan Egyptians until the Exodus (43:32; Num. 25:1-3 and notes). Under Jacob's blessing on Pharaoh (47:7, 10; cf. 12:2) and Pharaoh's honoring of Israel (45:17-20; 47:6; cf. 12:3) everyone prospered: Pharaoh gained control of all the property and people in Egypt (47:19-21), the Egyptians hailed Joseph as a savior (47:25), and Israel prospered even more than the Egyptians (47:27; Ex, 1:7). This mutual blessing and prosperity contrasts with the sit- uation four hundred years later when another pharaoh cursed Israel and was cursed (Ex. 1:8-14). | shepherds. Their identity as shepherds would assure Pharaoh that they entertained no social or political ambitions under their broth- er's auspices, and would help insulate them from intermarriage with the pagan Egyptians (v. 34; 43:32 and notes). The latter threat increased when they possessed property in Egypt (v. 11). | every shepherd is an abomination. The Egyptians too kept ani- mals (47:6; Ex. 9:3, 4); this probably refers to foreign shepherds (43:32 note). | In this remarkable audience with mighty Pharaoh—the greater typically blesses the lesser (14:19 and note)—the aged shepherd patri- arch demonstrated his dignity. His blessing was fulfilled in vy, 13-25. | sojourning. The Hebrew term denotes a temporary abode, the condition of a resident alien. Jacob described his own life, and that of his fathers, as a sojourn (21:34; 24:3; 26:3 and notes). Though awaiting the fulfillment of the divine covenant promise of land, their hope extended beyond Canaan to a heavenly and eternal country, to a “city... whose designer and builder is God" (Heb. 11:10). See notes 13:15 and Heb, 11:8-10. Few and evil. Jacob did not glory in the number of his years. Though blessed by God and a blessing to others, he had his share of human fail- ings and afflictions. | land of Rameses. Assuming an early date for the Exodus from Egypt (Introduction to Exodus: Interpretive Difficulties), this designation of the land of Goshen, after Pharaoh Rameses II (c. 1304-1236 B.<,), indi- cates that the place-name was updated after the time of Moses (14:14 note; Introduction: Date and Occasion). » | Joseph brought all the money, land, and people under Pharaoh in exchange for food, and preserved the Egyptians. | made servants of them, The Hebrew is uncertain. This reading describes the result of Joseph's policies—servitude for the people, The people, however, viewed Joseph not as a tyrant but as a savior (v. 25; cf. 45:7), | Having witnessed God's faithfulness, by faith Jacob looked beyond his death in Egypt to his burial in the Promised Land. | gained possessions ... multiplied greatly. In fulfillment of the divine promise (46:3 and notes). The independence and prosperity of the Israelites contrasts with the fate of the Egyptians (vv. 13-26 note). This description also provides a link with Ex. 1:7. | Joseph. Jacob later repeated the command to all his sons in 49:29-32, but Joseph was in charge (48:1 note). put your hand under my thigh. See note 24:2. | in their burying place. By faith Israel saw his destiny in the Promised Land, not in an embalmed body in the best land of Egypt (v. 11; 50:2). | Swear to me. Jacob asked that Joseph confirm his promise (v. 30) with a solemn oath. Likewise, God underscores the surety of His gracious covenant promise with an oath (15:8-21; 22:17; Heb. 6:13, 14 note). For Joseph's fulfillment of his oath see 50:1-14. bowed himself. An expression of reverent thanksgiving to God that his last wish would be fulfilled (cf. 1 Kin. 1:47, 48). | Manasseh and Ephraim. Joseph received the rights of firstborn and the double portion through Jacob’s adoption and elevation of his two sons to the status of founding fathers among Israel's twelve tribes (37:8; 43:3; 1 Chr. 5:2 and notes). The adoption ritual included Jacob's statements of authority (vv. 3, 4) and intent to adopt Ephraim and Manasseh (wy. 5-7), legal gestures (vv. 8-12), and words of blessing (vv. 15-16). An ancient text from the city of Ugarit (Ras Shamra) describes a similar adoption of a grandson (c. 1500 8.c,). | God Almighty. See note 17:1. appeared ... blessed me. God's direct revelation of the covenant bless- ing to Jacob empowered him to legitimate Joseph's two sons as num- bered among the twelve (v. 5) and to bless the twelve tribes (48:5-49:28). This preference for Joseph, giving him the double portion, reasserted God’s sovereign prerogative to do as He pleased with Israel (Introduction: Characteristics and Themes). at Luz. See 28:19. | fruitful ... company ... land. Jacob briefly summarizes the con- tent of the covenant promises to the patriarchs (12:1-3, 7; 13:14-17; 15:12-21; 17:4-8; 22:15-18; 28:3, 4, 13-15). | Ephraim and Manasseh. The younger (Ephraim) is again preferred before the older (vv. 17-20; 25:23 and note). Reuben and Simeon. The first two sons of Leah are mentioned because they are bypassed to give the double portion to Joseph, Rachel's first- born. Reuben lost his rights as firstborn because he defiled his father's marriage bed (35:22; 43:3 note; 49:3, 4). | shall be yours ... name of their brothers. Joseph's other sons were not adopted by Jacob, but would be embraced within the clans of Ephraim and Manasseh. These younger sons of Joseph are probably included in Num. 26:28-37; 1 Chr. 7:14-29. | Paddan. See note 25:20. Rachel. Though Leah was buried in the family grave (49:31; cf. 35:16-20), Rachel is honored and memorialized in the double portion given her firstborn. | Who are these. Identification of the beneficiaries was part of the blessing ritual (v. 1 note). The nearly sightless Jacob (cf. 27:1) carefully identified the recipients of the irrevocable blessing (27:7 note). | whom God has given. Joseph, who shared his father’s faith, gave the same answer as Jacob gave Esau to a similar question (33:5; cf. 41:51, 52 and note). | kissed them and embraced them. Part of the blessing ritual (27:26 and note). | In the blessing, Jacob's perspective shifts from thanksgiving for God's covenant faithfulness and miraculous provision (v. 15) to antic- ipation of God's faithfulness and blessing on future generations (v. 16). | Joseph ... bowed. The one second only to Pharaoh (41:40) hum- bled himself before the patriarch who mediated God's promises. from his knees. In the ancient Near East, the knee was symbolic of parental care and, by extension, of adoption (30:3 note), | right hand. In the ancient Near East oral statements were accompa- nied by the correct placement of the right hand, an action'that functioned as a legal safeguard. This is also the first instance in Scripture where a bless- ing is accompanied by the laying on of hands (cf. Ps. 139:5; Matt. 19:13-15), | he blessed Joseph. Joseph was represented in his two sons. Joseph was later blessed without distinguishing his two sons (49:22-26), See note 27:7. before whom my fathers ... walked. See note 17:1. 48:16 the angel. See note 16:7; 28:12; 31:11, 32:1, 22-32. | An explanatory notice appended here to the ritual so as not to interrupt the narrative (
Calvin (1560)
Genesis 37:1-36 1. And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger, in the land of Canaan. 1. Habitavit itaque Iahacob in terra peregrinationum patris sui, in terra Chenaan. 2. These are the generations of Jacob. Joseph, being seventeen years old, was feeding the flock with his brethren; and the lad was with the sons of Bilhah, and with the sons of Zilpah, his father's wives: and Joseph brought unto his father their evil report. 2. Istae sunt generationes Iahacob. Joseph filius septendecim annorum pascebat cum fratribus suis pecudes, et erat puer cum filiis Bilhah et cum filiis Zilpah uxorum patris sui: et retulit Ioseph obloquutionem eorum malam patri eorum. 3. Now Israel loved Joseph more than all his children, because he was the son of his old age: and he made him a coat of many colours. 3. Porro Israel diligebat Joseph prae cunctis filiis suis, quia filius senectutis erat ei: et fecerat ei tunicam multicolorem. 4. And when his brethren saw that their father loved him more than all his brethren, they hated him, and could not speak peaceably unto him. 4. Et viderunt fratres ejus, quod eum diligeret pater eorum prae cunctis fratribus ejus, et odio habebant eum, et non poterant alloqui eum pacifice. 5. And Joseph dreamed a dream, and he told it his brethren: and they hated him yet the more. 5. Somniavit autem Joseph somnium, et nuntiavit fratribus suis: et addiderunt amplius odio habere eum. 6. And he said unto them, Hear, I pray you, this dream which I have dreamed: 6. Dixit enim ad eos, Audite quaeso somnium hoc quod somniavi. 7. For, behold, we were binding sheaves in the field, and, lo, my sheaf arose, and also stood upright; and, behold, your sheaves stood round about, and made obeisance to my sheaf. 7. Ecce enim ligabamus manipulos in medio agri: et ecce surrexit manipulus meus, ac etiam stabat: et ecce circumdabant manipuli vestri, et incurvabant se manipulo meo. 8. And his brethren said to him, Shalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion over us? And they hated him yet the more for his dreams, and for his words. 8. Et dixerunt ei fratres ejus, Num regnando regnabis super nos? num dominando dominaberis nobis? Addiderunt ergo adhuc odio habere eum propter somnium ejus, et propter verba ejus. 9. And he dreamed yet another dream, and told it his brethren, and said, Behold, I have dreamed a dream more; and, behold, the sun and the moon and the eleven stars made obeisance to me. 9. Et somniavit adhuc somnium alterum, et narrativ illud fratribus suis, et dixit, Ecce, somniavi somnium adhuc: et ecce, sol et luna et undecim stellae incurvabant se mihi. 10. And he told it to his father, and to his brethren: and his father rebuked him, and said unto him, What is this dream that thou hast dreamed? Shall I and thy mother and thy brethren indeed come to bow down ourselves to thee to the earth? 10. Et narravit patri suo et fratribus suis: et increpavit eum pater ejus, et dixit ei, Quid est hoc comnium quod somniasti? Num veniendo veniemus ego et mater tua, et fratres tui, ut incurvemus nos tibi ad terram? 11. And his brethren envied him; but his father observed the saying. 11. Et inviderunt ei fratres ejus: sed pater ejus observabat rem. 12. And his brethren went to feed their father's flock in Shechem. 12. Profecti autem sunt fratres ejus, ut pascerent pecudes patris sui in Sechem. 13. And Israel said unto Joseph, Do not thy brethren feed the flock in Shechem? come, and I will send thee unto them. And he said to him, Here am I 13. Et dixit Israel ad Hoseph, Nonne fratres tui pascunt in Sechem? Veni, et mittam to ad eos. Et dixit ei, Ecce adsum. 14. And he said to him, Go, I pray thee, see whether it be well with thy brethren, and well with the flocks; and bring me word again. So he sent him out of the vale of Hebron, and he came to Shechem. 14. Et ait ei, Vade nune, vide incolumitatem fratrum tuorum, et incolmitatem pecorum, et refer mihi rem: et misit eum ex valle Hebron: et venit in Sechem. 15. And a certain man found him, and, behold, he was wandering in the field: and the man asked him, saying, What seekest thou? 15. Porro invenit eum vir, et ecce errabat in agro: interrogavit autem eum vir ille, dicendo, Quid quaeris? 16. And he said, I seek my brethren: tell me, I pray thee, where they feed their flocks 16. Et dixit, Fratres meos ego quaero, nuntia, obsecro, mihi, ubi ipsi pascant. 17. And the man said, They are departed hence; for I heard them say, Let us go to Dothan. And Joseph went after his brethren, and found them in Dothan. 17. Et dixit vir ille, Profecti sunt hinc: audivi enim eos dicentes, Eamus in Dothan. Et perrexit Joseph post fratres suos, et invenit eos in Dothan. 18. And when they saw him afar off, even before he came near unto them, they conspired against him to slay him. 18. Et viderunt eum e longinquo: et antequam appropinquaret eis, machinati sunt contra eum ut interimerent eum. 19. And they said one to another, Behold, this dreamer cometh. 19. Ac dicebat alter alteri, Ecce, magister ille somniorum venit. 20. Come now therefore, and let us slay him, and cast him into some pit, and we will say, Some evil beast hath devoured him: and we shall see what will become of his dreams. 20. Nune igitur venite, et occidamus illum, et projiciamus eum in unam e cisternis: et dicemus, Bestia mala devoravit eum: et videbinus quid erunt somnia ejus. 21. And Reuben heard it, and he delivered him out of their hands; and said, Let us not kill him. 21. Et audivit Reuben, et eripuit eum e manu eorum, et dixit, Ne percutiamus eum in anima. 22. And Reuben said unto them, Shed no blood, but cast him into this pit that is in the wilderness, and lay no hand upon him; that he might rid him out of their hands, to deliver him to his father again. 22. Dixit ergo ad eos Ruben, Ne effundatis sanguinem: projicite eum in cisternam hanc, quae est in deserto, et manum ne mittatis in eum: ut erueret eum e manu eorum, ut reduceret eum ad patrem suum. 23. And it came to pass, when Joseph was come unto his brethren, that they stript Joseph out of his coat, his coat of many colours that was on him; 23. Et fuit, ut venit Joseph ad fratres suos, exuerunt Joseph tunica sua, tunica multicolore, quae erat super eum. 24. And they took him, and cast him into a pit: and the pit was empty, there was no water in it. 24. Et tulerunt eum, et projecerunt eum in cisternam: et cisterna erat vacua, non erat in ea aqua. 25. And they sat down to eat bread: and they lifted up their eyes and looked, and, behold, a company of Ishmeelites came from Gilead with their camels bearing spicery and balm and myrrh, going to carry it down to Egypt. 25. Postea sederunt ut comederent panem, et levaverunt oculos suos, et viderunt, et ecce turba Ismaelitarum veeniebat de Gilhad, et cameli eorum portabant aromata, et resinam, et stacten, iter facientes ut deferrent in Aegyptum. 26. And Judah said unto his brethren, What profit is it if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood? 26. Et dixit Jehudah fratribus suis, Quae utilitas si occiderimus fratrem mostrum, et celaverimus sanguinem ejus? 27. Come, and let us sell him to the Ishmeelites, and let not our hand be upon him; for he is our brother and our flesh. And his brethren were content. 27. Venite, et vendamus eum Ismaelitis, et manus nostra ne sit in eum, quia frater noster, caro nostra est: et paruerunt ei fratres ejus. 28. Then there passed by Midianites merchantmen; and they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmeelites for twenty pieces of silver: and they brought Joseph into Egypt. 28. Et transierunt viri Madianitae mercatores, et extraxerunt et sustulerunt Joseph e cisterna: et vendiderunt Joseph Ismaelitis viginti argenteis, qui abduxerunt Ioseph in Aegyptum. 29. And Reuben returned unto the pit; and, behold, Joseph was not in the pit; and he rent his clothes. 29. Deinde reversus est Reuben ad cisternam, et ecce non erat Joseph in cisterna, et scidit vestimenta sua. 30. And he returned unto his brethren, and said, The child is not; and I, whither shall I go? 30. Et reversus est ad fratres suos, et dixit, Puer non est, et ego quo, ego quo ibo? 31. And they took Joseph's coat, and killed a kid of the goats, and dipped the coat in the blood; 31. Et tulerunt tunicam Joseph, et jugulaverunt hircum caprarum, et tinxerunt tunicam in sanguine. 32. And they sent the coat of many colours, and they brought it to their father; and said, This have we found: know now whether it be thy son's coat or no. 32. et miserunt tunicam multicolorem, et deferri fecerunt ad patrem suum, et dixerunt, Hanc invevenimus, agnosce nunc utrum tunica filii tui sit, annon. 33. And he knew it, and said, It is my son's coat; an evil beast hath devoured him; Joseph is without doubt rent in pieces. 33. Et agnovit eam, et dixit, Tunica filii mei est: bestia mala devoravit eum, rapiendo raptus est Ioseph. 34. And Jacob rent his clothes, and put sackcloth upon his loins, and mourned for his son many days. 34. Et scidit Iahacob vestimenta sua, et posuit saccum in lumbis suis, et luxit super filio suo diebus multis. 35. And all his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted; and he said, For I will go down into the grave unto my son mourning. Thus his father wept for him. 35. Et surrexerunt omnes filii ejus, et omnes filiae ejus, ut consolarentur eum, sed noluit consolationem admittere: et dixit, Certe descendam ad filium meum lugens ad sepulcrum: et luxit eum pater ejus. 36. And the Midianites sold him into Egypt unto Potiphar, an officer of Pharaoh's, and captain of the guard. 36. Madanitae autem vendiderunt eum in Aegypto Potiphar satrapae Pharaonis, principi satellitum. 1. And Jacob dwelt. Moses confirms what he had before declared, that, by the departure of Esau, the land was left to holy Jacob as its sole possessor. Although in appearance he did not obtain a single clod; yet, contented with the bare sight of the land, he exercised his faith; and Moses expressly compares him with his father, who had been a stranger in that land all his life. Therefore, though by the removal of his brother to another abode, Jacob was no little gainer; yet it was the Lord's will that this advantage should be hidden from his eyes, in order that he might depend entirely upon the promise. 2. These are the generations of Jacob. By the word tvldvt toledoth we are not so much to understand a genealogy, as a record of events, which appears more clearly from the context. For Moses having thus commenced, does not enumerate sons and grandsons, but explains the cause of the envy of Joseph's brethren, who formed a wicked conspiracy against him, and sold him as a slave: as if he had said "Having briefly summed up the genealogy of Esau, I now revert to the series of my history, as to what happened to the family of Jacob." [132] Moreover, Moses being about to speak of the abominable wickedness of Jacob's sons, begins with the statement, that Joseph was dear beyond the rest to his father, because he had begotten him in his old age: and as a token of tender love, had clothed him with a coat woven of many colors. But it was not surprising that the boy should be a great favorite with his aged father, for so it is wont to happen: and no just ground is here given for envy; seeing that sons of a more robust age, by the dictate of nature, might well concede such a point. Moses, however, states this as the cause of odium, that the mind of his father was more inclined to him than to the rest. The brethren conceive enmity against the boy, whom they see to be more tenderly loved by their father, as having been born in his old age. [133] If they did not choose to join in this love to their brother, why did they not excuse it in their father? Hence, then, we perceive their malignant and perverse disposition. But, that a manycoloured coat and similar trifles inflamed them to devise a scheme of slaughter, is a proof of their detestable cruelty. Moses also says that their hatred increased, because Joseph conveyed the evil speeches of his brethren to their father. Some expound the word evil as meaning some intolerable crime; but others more correctly suppose, that it was a complaint of the boy that his brothers vexed him with their reproaches; for, what follows in Moses, I take to have been added in explanation, that we may know the cause for which he had been treated so ill and with such hostility. It may be asked, why Moses here accuses only the sons of Bilhah and Zilpah, when, afterwards, he does not exempt the sons of Leah from the same charge? One, indeed, of her sons, Reuben, was milder than any of the rest; next to him was Judah, who was his uterine brother. But what is to be said of Simon? What of Levi? Certainly since they were older, it is probable that they were leaders in the affair. The suspicion may, however, be entertained, that because these were the sons of concubines and not of true wives, their minds would be more quickly moved with envy; as if their servile extraction, on the mother's side, subjected them to contempt. 6. And Joseph dreamed a dream. Moses having stated what were the first seeds of this enmity, now ascends higher, and shows that Joseph had been elected, by the wonderful purpose of God, to great things; that this had been declared to him in a dream; and that, therefore, the hatred of his brethren broke forth into madness. God, however, revealed in dreams what he would do, that afterwards it might be known that nothing had happened fortuitously: but that what had been fixed by a celestial decree, was at length, in its proper time, carried forward through circuitous windings to its completion. It had been predicted to Abraham that his seed should be wanderers from the land of Canaan. In order, then, that Jacob might pass over into Egypt, this method was divinely appointed; namely, that Joseph, being president over Egypt in a time of famine, might bring his father thither with his whole family, and supply them with food. Now, from the facts first related, no one could have conjectured such a result. The sons of Jacob conspire to put the very person to death, without whom they cannot be preserved; yea, he who was ordained to be the minister of salvation to them, is thrown into a well, and with difficulty rescued from the jaws of death. Driven about by various misfortunes, he seems to be an alien from his father's house. Afterwards, he is cast into prison, as into another sepulcher, where, for a long time, he languishes. Nothing, therefore, was less probable than that the family of Jacob should be preserved by his means, when he was cut off from it, and carried far away, and not even reckoned among the living. Nor did any hope of his liberation remain, especially from the time in which he was neglected by the chief butler; but being condemned to perpetual imprisonment, he was left there to rot. God, however, by such complicated methods, accomplishes what he had purposed. Wherefore, in this history, we have not only a most beautiful example of Divine Providence, but also two other points are added especially worthy of notice: first, that the Lord performs his work by wonderful and unusual modes; and, secondly, that he brings forth the salvation of his Church, not from magnificent splendor, but from death and the grave. Besides, in the person of Joseph, a lively image of Christ is presented, as will more fully appear from the context. But since these subjects will be often repeated, let us follow the thread of Moses' discourse. God, of his mere grace, conferred peculiar honor on the boy, who was the last but one among twelve, in giving him the priority among his brethren. For, by what merit or virtue shall we say that he attained the lordship over his brethren? Afterwards he seemed, indeed, to acquire this by his own great beneficence: but from the dream we learn, that it was the free gift of God, which in no way depended upon Joseph's beneficence. Rather, he was ordained to be chief, by the mere good pleasure of God, in order that he might show kindness to his brethren. Now, since the Lord was, at that time, wont to reveal his secrets by two methods -- by visions and by dreams -- one of these kinds is here noted. For no doubt Joseph had often dreamed in the common manner: but Moses shows that a dream was now divinely sent to him, which might have the force and weight of an oracle. We know that dreams are often produced by our daily thoughts: sometimes they are indications of an unhealthy state of the body: but whenever God intends to make known his counsel by dreams, he engraves on them certain marks, which distinguish them from passing and frivolous imaginations, in order that their credibility and authority may stand firm. Thus Joseph, being certainly persuaded that he had not been deluded by an empty spectra, fearlessly announced his dream as a celestial oracle. Now, although the dominion is promised to him under a rural symbol, it is one which does not seem suitable for instruction to the sons of Jacob; for we know that they were herdsman, not ploughmen. Since they had no harvest which they could gather in, it seems hardly congruous that homage should be paid to his sheaf: But perhaps God designedly chose this similitude, to show that this prophecy was not founded upon the present fortunes of Joseph, and that the material of his dominion would not consist in those things which were at hand, but that it should be a future benefit, the cause of which was to be sought for elsewhere than at home. 8. Shalt thou indeed reign over us? Here it is plainly shown to us that the paternal favor of God towards the elect, is like a fan to excite against them the enmity of the world. When the sons of Jacob heard that they were fighting in vain against God, their unjust hatred ought, by such means, to have been corrected. For it was as if God, setting himself in the midst, would repress their fury by these words, "Your impious conspiring will be fruitless; for although you boast, I have constituted as your chief, the man whose ruin your wicked envy hurries you to seek." Perhaps, also, by this consolatory dream, he intended to alleviate the trouble of the holy youth. Yet their obstinacy caused it to be the more increased. Let us then learn not to be grieved if, at any time, the shining of the grace of God upon us should cause us to be envied. The sons of Jacob, however, were but too acute interpreters of the dream: yet they deride it as a fable, because it was repugnant to their wishes. Thus it often happens that they who are ill-disposed, quickly perceive what is the will of God: but, because they feel no reverence, they despise it. To this contumacy, however, succeeds a stupor which destroys their former quick-sightedness. 9. And he dreamed yet another dream. The scope of this dream is the same. The only difference is, that God, to inspire greater confidence in the oracle, presents him with a figure from heaven. The brethren of Joseph had despised what was said concerning the sheaves; the Lord now calls upon them to look towards heaven, where his august Majesty shines forth. It may, however, be asked, how it can be reconciled with fact, that his mother, who was now dead, could come and bow down to him. The interpretation of certain Hebrews, who refer it to Bilhah, is frigid, and the sense appears plain without such subterfuges: for the sun and moon designate the head of the family on each side: thus, in this figure, Joseph sees himself reverenced by the whole house of his father. 10. And his father rebuked him. If Jacob suspected that the dream originated in vain ambition, he rightly rebuked his son; but if he knew that God was the author of the dream, he ought not to have expostulated with him. But that he did know it, may be hence inferred, because he is afterwards said seriously to have considered it. For Moses, making a distinction between him and his sons, says that they breathed nothing but the virus of envy; while he revolved in his own mind what this might mean; which could not have happened, unless he had been affected with reverence. But seeing that a certain religious impression on the subject rested on his mind, how was it that he rebuked his son? This truly was not giving honor to God and to his word. For it ought to have occurred to the mind of Jacob that, although Joseph was under his authority, he yet sustained a prophetic character. It is probable, when he saw his sons so malevolent, that he wished to meet the danger by feigning what he did not feel: for he was not offended at the dream, but he was unwilling to exasperate the minds of those who, on account of their pride, would not bear to be in subjection. Therefore I do not doubt that he feignedly reproved his son, from a desire to appease contention. Nevertheless, this method of pretending to be adverse to the truth, when we are endeavoring to appease the anger of those who rage against it, is by no means approved by God. He ought rather ingenuously to have exhorted his sons not to "kick against the pricks." Or at least he should have used this moderate address, "If this is a common dream, let it be treated with ridicule rather than with anger; but if it has proceeded from God, it is wicked to speak against it." It is even possible that the unsuitableness of the dream had struck the mind of the old man. For we know how difficult it is entirely to throw off all sense of superiority. Certainly, though Jacob declines slightly from the right course, yet his piety appears to be of no common order; because his reverence for the oracle so easily prevailed over every other feeling. But the most wicked obstinacy betrays itself in his sons, seeing they break out into greater enmity. For though they despise the dream, yet they are not made angry about nothing. Gladly would they have had their brother as a laughing-stock; but a certain secret sense of the Deity constrains them, so that, with or against their will, they are compelled to feel that there is something authentic in the dream. Meanwhile, a blind ferocity impels them to an unintentional resistance against God. Therefore, that we may be held in obedience to God, let us learn to bring down our high spirits; because the beginning of docility is for men to submit to be brought into order. This obstinacy in the sons of Jacob was most censurable, because they not only rejected the oracle of God through their hatred of subjection, but were hostile to his messenger and herald. How much less excusable, then, will be our hardness, if we do not meekly submit our necks to the yoke of God; since the doctrine of humility, which subdues and even mortifies us, is not only more clearly revealed, but also confirmed by the precious blood of Christ? If, however, we see many refractory persons at this day, who refuse to embrace the gospel, and who perversely rise up against it, let us not be disturbed as by some new thing, seeing that the whole human race is infected with the disease of pride; for by the gospel all the glory of the flesh is reduced to nothing; rather let us know that all remain obstinate, except those who are rendered meek by the subduing influence of the Spirit. 12. And his brethren went. Before Moses treats of the horrible design of fratricide, he describes the journey of Joseph, and amplifies, by many circumstances, the atrocity of the crime. Their brother approaches them in the discharge of a duty, to make a fraternal inquiry after their state. He comes by the command of his father; and obeys it without reluctance, as appears from his answer. He searches them out anxiously; and though they had changed their place, he spares neither labor nor trouble till he finds them. Therefore their cruelty was something more than madness, seeing they did not shrink with horror from contriving the death of a brother so pious and humane. We now see that Moses does not relate, without a purpose, that a man met Joseph in his wanderings, and told him that his brethren had departed to Dothan. For the greater was his diligence in his indefatigable pursuit, so much the less excusable were they by whom such an unworthy recompense was repaid. 18. And when they saw him afar off. Here again Moses, so far from sparing the fame of his own family by adulation, brands its chiefs with a mark of eternal infamy, and exposes them to the hatred and execration of all nations. If, at any time, among heathens, a brother murdered his brother, such impiety was treated with the utmost severity in tragedies, that it might not pass into an example for imitation. But in profane history no such thing is found, as that nine brethren should conspire together for the destruction of an innocent youth, and, like wild beasts, should pounce upon him with bloody hands. Therefore a horrible, and even diabolical fury, took possession of the sons of Jacob, when, having cast aside the sense of nature, they were thus prepared cruelly to rage against their own blood. But, in addition to this wickedness, Moses condemns their impious contempt of God, Behold this master of dreams. For why do they insult the unhappy youth, except because he had been called by the celestial oracle to an unexpected dignity? Besides, in this manner, they themselves proclaim their own baseness more publicly than any one could do, who should purposely undertake severely to chastise them. They confess that the cause why they persecuted their brother was his having dreamed; as if truly this ass an inexpiable offense; but if they are indignant at his dreams, why do they not rather wage war with God? For Joseph deemed it necessary to receive, as a precious deposit, what had been divinely revealed unto him. But because they did not dare directly to assail God, they wrap themselves in clouds, that, losing sight of God, they may vent their fury against their brother. If such blindness seized upon the patriarchs, what shall become of the reprobates, whom obstinate malice drives along, so that they do not hesitate to resist God even to the last? And we see that they willingly disturb and excite themselves, as often as they are offended with the threatenings and chastisements of God, and rise up against his ministers for the sake of taking vengeance. The same thing, indeed, would at times happen to us all, unless God should put on his bridle to render us submissive. With respect to Joseph, the special favor of God was manifested to him, and he was raised to the highest dignity; but only in a dream, which is ridiculed by the wicked scorn of his brethren. To this is also added a conspiracy, so that he narrowly escaped death. Thus the promise of God, which had exalted him to honor, almost plunges him into the grave. We, also, who have received the gratuitous adoption of God amidst many sorrows, experience the same thing. For, from the time that Christ gathers us into his flock, God permits us to be cast down in various ways, so that we seem nearer hell than heaven. Therefore, let the example of Joseph be fixed in our minds, that we be not disquieted when many crosses spring forth to us from the root of God's favor. For I have before showed, and the thing itself clearly testifies, that in Joseph was adumbrated, what was afterwards more fully exhibited in Christ, the Head of the Church, in order that each member may form itself to the imitation of his example. 20. And cast him into some pit. Before they perpetrate the murder, they seek a pretext whereby they may conceal their crime from men. Meanwhile, it never enters into their mind, that what is hidden from men cannot escape the eyes of God. But so stupid is hypocrisy, that while it flees from the disgrace of the world, it is careless about the judgment of God. But it is a disease deeply rooted in the human mind, to put some specious color on every extreme act of iniquity. For although an inward judge convicts the guilty, they yet confirm themselves in impudence, that their disgrace may not appear unto others. And we shall see what will become of his dreams. As if the truth of God could be subverted by the death of one man, they boast that they shall have attained their wish when they have killed their brother; namely, that his dreams will come to nothing. This is not, indeed, their avowed purpose, but turbulent envy drives them headlong to fight against God. But whatever they design in thus contending with God in the dark, their attempts will, at length, prove vain. For God will always find a way through the most profound abyss, to the accomplishment of what he has decreed. If, then, unbelievers provoke us by their reproaches, and proudly boast that our faith will profit us nothing; let not their insolence discourage or weaken us, but let us confidently proceed. 21. And Reuben heard it. It may be well to observe, while others were hastening to shed his blood, by whose care Joseph was preserved. Reuben doubtless, in one affair, was the most wicked of them all, when he defiled his father's couch; and that unbridled lust, involving other vices, was the sign of a depraved nature: now suddenly, he alone, having a regard to piety, and being mindful of fraternal duty, dissolves the impious conspiracy. It is uncertain whether he was now seeking the means of making some compensation, for the sake of which he might be restored to his father's favor. Moses declares that it was his intention to restore the boy in safety to his father: whence the conjecture which I have stated is probable, that he thought the life of his brother would be a sufficient price by which he might reconcile his father's mind to himself. However this may be, yet the humanity which he showed in attempting to liberate his brother, is a proof that he was not abandoned to every kind of wickedness. And perhaps God, by this testimony of his penitence, designed in some degree to lessen his former disgrace. Whence we are taught that the characters of men are not to be estimated by a single act, however atrocious, so as to cause us to despair of their salvation. 22. Cast him into this pit. The pious fallacy to which Reuben descended, sufficiently proves with what vehemence the rage of his brethren was burning. For he neither dares openly to oppose them, nor to dissuade them from their crime; because he saw that no reasons would avail to soften them. Nor does it extenuate their cruelty, that they consent to his proposal, as if they were disposed to clemency; for if either one course or the other were necessary, it would have been better for him immediately to die by their hands, than to perish by slow hunger in the pit, which is the most cruel kind of punishment. Their gross hypocrisy is rather to be noticed; because they think that they shall be free from crime, if only they do not stain their hands with their brother's blood. As if, indeed, it made any difference, whether they ran their brother through with a sword, or put him to death by suffocation. For the Lord, when he accuses the Jews by Isaiah, of having hands full of blood, does not mean that they were assassins, but he calls them bloody, because they did not spare their suffering brethren. Therefore, the sons of Jacob are nothing better, in casting their brother alive under ground, that, as one buried, he might in vain contend with death, and perish after protracted torments; and in choosing a pit in the desert, from which no mortal could hear his dying cry, though his sighing would ascend even to heaven. It was a barbarous thought, that they should not touch his life, if they did not imbrue their hands in his blood; since it was a kind of death, not less violent, which they wished to inflict by hunger. Reuben, however, accommodating his language to their brutal conceptions, deemed it sufficient to repress, by any kind of artifice, their impetuosity for the present. 23. They stripped Joseph out of his coat [134] We see that these men are full of fictions and lies. They carelessly strip their brother; they feel no dread at casting him with their own hands into the pit, where hunger worse than ten swords might consume him; because they hope their crime will be concealed; and in taking home his clothes, no suspicion of his murder would be excited; because, truly, their father would believe that he had been torn by a wild beast. Thus Satan infatuates wicked minds, so that they entangle themselves by frivolous evasions. Conscience is indeed the fountain of modesty; but Satan so soothes by his allurements those whom he has entangled in his snares, that conscience itself, which ought to have cited them as guilty before the bar of God, only hardens them the more. For, having found out subterfuges, they break forth f
Geneva Bible Notes (1599)
And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a {a} stranger, in the land of Canaan. (a) That is, the story of such things as came to him and his family as in Ge 5:1
John Trapp (1647)
And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger, in the land of Canaan. In the land of his father’s sojournings (Marg.). — The dukes of Edom had habitations in the land of their possessions. Genesis 36:43 But Jacob, with his father Isaac, were pilgrims in the land of Canaan; content to dwell in tents here, that they might dwell with God for ever. Justin Martyr saith of the Christians of his time: They dwell in their own countries but as strangers; have fight to all, as citizens; but suffer hardship, as foreigners, … Pατπιδας οικουσιν ιδιας, αλλ" ως παροικοι , … - Epist. ad Diognetum.
John Gill (1748)
And Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger,.... And this stands opposed unto, and is distinguished from the case and circumstances of Esau and his posterity, expressed in the preceding chapter, who dwelt in the land of their possession, not as strangers and sojourners, as Jacob and his seed, but as lords and proprietors; and so these words may be introduced and read in connection with the former history; "but Jacob dwelt", &c. (a); and this verse would better conclude the preceding chapter than begin a new one. The Targum of Jonathan paraphrases the words, "and Jacob dwelt quietly"; or peaceably, in tranquillity and safety; his brother Esau being gone from him into another country, he remained where his father lived and died, and in the country that by his blessing belonged to him: in the land of Canaan, and particularly in Hebron, where Isaac and Abraham before him had dwelt. (a) "at habitavit", Schmidt.
Matthew Henry (1714)
In Joseph's history we see something of Christ, who was first humbled and then exalted. It also shows the lot of Christians, who must through many tribulations enter into the kingdom. It is a history that has none like it, for displaying the various workings of the human mind, both good and bad, and the singular providence of God in making use of them for fulfilling his purposes. Though Joseph was his father's darling, yet he was not bred up in idleness. Those do not truly love their children, who do not use them to business, and labour, and hardships. The fondling of children is with good reason called the spoiling of them. Those who are trained up to do nothing, are likely to be good for nothing. But Jacob made known his love, by dressing Joseph finer than the rest of his children. It is wrong for parents to make a difference between one child and another, unless there is great cause for it, by the children's dutifulness, or undutifulness. When parents make a difference, children soon notice it, and it leads to quarrels in families. Jacob's sons did that, when they were from under his eye, which they durst not have done at home with him; but Joseph gave his father an account of their ill conduct, that he might restrain them. Not as a tale-bearer, to sow discord, but as a faithful brother.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown
CHAPTER 37 Ge 37:1-4. Parental Partiality. 1. Jacob dwelt in the land wherein his father was a stranger—that is, "a sojourner"; "father" used collectively. The patriarch was at this time at Mamre, in the valley of Hebron (compare Ge 35:27); and his dwelling there was continued in the same manner and prompted by the same motives as that of Abraham and Isaac (Heb 11:13).Jacob dwells in Canaan: Joseph brings to his father an ill report of his brethren, Genesis 37:2 . He loves, they hate him, Genesis 37:3 ,4 ; the more because of his dreams which he told them, Genesis 37:5 . His first dream, Genesis 37:7 . His brethren interpret it, and their hatred increases, Genesis 37:8 . His second dream, Genesis 37:9 . Tells it to his father, who rebukes him, but observes his saying, Genesis 37:10 ,11 . He is sent by his father to seek after his brethren, Genesis 37:13-17 . They seeing him, conspire his death, Genesis 37:18-20 . But upon the intercession of Reuben they strip and throw him into a pit, Genesis 37:21-24 . Some Ishmeelites passing by, by Judahâs advice they sell him to them, who carry him into Egypt, Genesis 37:25-28 . Reuben is concerned for him, Genesis 37:29 ,30 . Their contrivance to deceive Jacob, Genesis 37:31 ,32 . His grief for the loss of Joseph, Genesis 37:33-35 . Joseph sold to Potiphar, an officer in Egypt, Genesis 37:36 . 1729 No text from Poole on this verse.
Barnes (1832)
Joseph is the favorite of his father, but not of his brethren. "In the land of his father's sojournings." This contrasts Jacob with Esau, who removed to Mount Seir. This notice precedes the phrase, "These are the generations." The corresponding sentence in the case of Isaac is placed at the end of the preceding section of the narrative Genesis 25:11 . "The son of seventeen years;" in his seventeenth year Genesis 37:32 . "The sons of Bilhah." The sons of the handmaids were nearer his own age, and perhaps more tolerant of the favorite than the sons of Leah the free wife. Benjamin at this time was about four years of age. "An evil report of them." The unsophisticated child of home is prompt in the disapproval of evil, and frank in the avowal of his feelings. What the evil was we are not informed; but Jacob's full-grown sons were now far from the paternal eye, and prone, as it seems, to give way to temptation. Many scandals come out to view in the chosen family. "Loved Joseph." He was the son of his best-loved wife, and of his old age; as Benjamin had not yet come into much notice. "A Coat of many colors." This was a coat reaching to the hands and feet, worn by persons not much occupied with manual labor, according to the general opinion. It was, we conceive, variegated either by the loom or the needle, and is therefore, well rendered χιτὼν ποικίλος chitōn poikilos, a motley coat. "Could not bid peace to him." The partiality of his father, exhibited in so weak a manner, provokes the anger of his brothers, who cannot bid him good-day, or greet him in the ordinary terms of good-will.
MacLaren (1910)
Genesis THE TRIALS AND VISIONS OF DEVOUT YOUTH Genesis 37:1 - Genesis 37:11 . âThe generations of Jacobâ are mainly occupied with the history of Joseph, because through him mainly was the divine purpose carried on. Jacob is now the head of the chosen family, since Isaacâs death { Genesis 35:29 }, and therefore the narrative is continued under that new heading. There may possibly be intended a contrast in âdweltâ and âsojournedâ in Genesis 37:1 , the former implying a more complete settling down. There are two principal points in this narrative,-the sad insight that it gives into the state of the household in which so much of the worldâs history and hopes was wrapped up, and the preludings of Josephâs future in his dreams. As to the former, the account of it is introduced by the statement that Joseph, at seventeen years of age, was set to work, according to the wholesome Eastern usage, and so was thrown into the company of the sons of the two slave-women, Bilhah and Zilpah. Delitzsch understands âladâ in Genesis 37:2 in the sense in which we use âboy,â as meaning an attendant. Joseph was, then, told off to be subordinate to these two sets of his rough brothers. The relationship was enough to rouse hatred in such coarse souls. And, indeed, the history of Jacobâs household strikingly illustrates the miserable evils of polygamy, which makes families within the family, and turns brothers into enemies. Bilhahâs and Zilpahâs sons reflected in their hatred of Rachelâs their mothersâ envy of the true wife of Jacobâs heart. The sons of the bondwoman were sure to hate the sons of the free. If Joseph had been like his brothers, they would have forgiven him his mother. But he was horrified at his first glimpse of unrestrained young passions, and, in the excitement of disgust and surprise, âtold their evil report.â No doubt, his brothers had been unwilling enough to be embarrassed by his presence, for there is nothing that wild young men dislike more than the constraint put on them by the presence of an innocent youth; and when they found out that this âmilk-sopâ of a brother was a spy and a telltale, their wrath blazed up. So Joseph had early experience of the shock which meets all young men who have been brought up in godly households when they come into contact with sin in fellow-clerks, servants, students, or the like. It is a sharp test of what a young man is made of, to come forth from the shelter of a fatherâs care and a motherâs love, and to be forced into witnessing and hearing such things as go on wherever a number of young men are thrown together. Be not âpartaker of other menâs sins.â And the trial is doubly great when the tempters are elder brothers, and the only way to escape their unkindness is to do as they do. Joseph had an early experience of the need of resistance; and, as long as the world is a world, love to God will mean hatred from its worst elements. If we are âsons of the day,â we cannot but rebuke the darkness. It is an invidious office to tell other peopleâs evil-doing, and he who brings evil reports of others generally and deservedly gets one for himself. But there are circumstances in which to do so is plain duty, and only a mistaken sense of honour keeps silence. But there must be no exaggeration, malice, or personal ends in the informer. Classmates in school or college, fellow-servants, employees in great businesses, and the like, have not only a duty of loyalty to one another, but of loyalty to their superior. We are sometimes bound to be blind to, and dumb about, our associatesâ evil deeds, but sometimes silence makes us accomplices. Jacob had a right to know, and Joseph would have been wrong if he had not told him, the truth about his brothers. Their hatred shows that his purity had made their doing wrong more difficult. It is a grand thing when a young manâs presence deprives the Devil of elbow-room for his tricks. How much restraining influence such a one may exert! Jacobâs somewhat foolish love, and still more foolish way of showing it, made matters worse. There were many excuses for him. He naturally clung to the son of his lost but never-forgotten first love, and as naturally found, in Josephâs freedom from the vices of his other sons, a solace and joy. It has been suggested that the âlong garment with sleeves,â in which he decked the lad, indicated an intention of transferring the rights of the first-born to him, but in any case it meant distinguishing affection; and the father or mother who is weak enough to show partiality in the treatment of children need not wonder if their unwise love creates bitter heart-burnings. Perhaps, if Bilhahâs and Zilpahâs sons had had a little more sunshine of a fatherâs love, they would have borne brighter flowers and sweeter fruit. It is fatal when a child begins to suspect that a parent is not fair. So these surly brothers, who could not even say âPeace be to thee!â {the common salutation} when they came across Joseph, had a good deal to say for themselves. It is a sad picture of the internal feuds of the house from which all nations were to be blessed. The Bible does not idealise its characters, but lets us see the seamy side of the tapestry, that we may the more plainly recognise the Mercy which forgives, and the mighty Providence which works through, such imperfect men. But the great lesson for all young people from the picture of Josephâs early days, when his whiteness rebuked the soiled lives of his brothers, as new-fallen snow the grimy cake, hardened and soiled on the streets, is, âMy son, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not.â Never mind a worldâs hatred, if you have a fatherâs love. There is one Father who can draw His obedient children into the deepest secrets of His heart without withholding their portion from the most prodigal. Josephâs dreams are the other principal point in the narrative. The chief incidents of his life turn on dreams,-his own, his fellow-prisonersâ, Pharaohâs. The narrative recognises them as divinely sent, and no higher form of divine communication appears to have been made to Joseph, He received no new revelations of religious truth. His mission was, not to bring fresh messages from heaven, but to effect the transference of the nation to Egypt. Hence the lower form of the communications made to him. The meaning of both dreams is the same, but the second goes beyond the first in the grandeur of the emblems, and in the inclusion of the parents in the act of obeisance. Both sets of symbols were drawn from familiar sights. The homeliness of the âsheavesâ is in striking contrast with the grandeur of the âsun, moon, and stars.â The interpretation of the first is ready to hand, because the sheaves were âyour sheavesâ and âmy sheaf.â There was no similar key included in the second, and his brothers do not appear to have caught its meaning. It was Jacob who read it. Probably Rachel was dead when the dream came, but that need not make a difficulty. Note that Joseph did not tell his dreams with elation, or with a notion that they meant anything particular. It is plainly the singularity of them that makes him repeat them, as is clearly indicated by the repeated âbeholdâ in his two reports. With perfect innocence of intention, and as he would have told any other strange dream, the lad repeats them. The commentary was the work of his brothers, who were ready to find proofs of his being put above them, and of his wish to humiliate them, in anything he said or did. They were wiser than he was. Perhaps they suspected that Jacob meant to set him at the head of the clan on his decease, and that the dreams were trumped up and told to them to prepare them for the decision which the special costume may have already hinted. At all events, hatred is very suspicious, and ready to prick up its ears at every syllable that seems to speak of the advancement of its object. There is a world of contempt, rage, and fear in the questions, âShalt thou indeed reign over us? or shalt thou indeed have dominion over us?â The conviction that Joseph was marked out by God for a high position seems to have entered these rough souls, and to have been fuel to fire. Hatred and envy make a perilous mixture. Any sin can come from a heart drenched with these. Jacob seems to have been wise enough to make light of the dreams to the lad, though much of them in his heart. Youthful visions of coming greatness are often best discouraged. The surest way to secure their fulfilment is to fill the present with strenuous, humble work. âDo the duty that is nearest thee.â âThe true apprenticeship for a ruler is to serve.â âAct, act, in the living present.â The sheaves may come to bow down some day, but âmy sheafâ has to be cut and bound first, and the sooner the sickle is among the corn, the better. But yet, on the other hand, let young hearts be true to their early visions, whether they say much about them or not. Probably it will be wisest to keep silence. But there shine out to many young men and women, at their start in life, bright possibilities of no ignoble sort, and rising higher than personal ambition, which it is the misery and sin of many to see âfade away into the light of common day,â or into the darkness of night. Be not âdisobedient to the heavenly visionâ; for the dreams of youth are often the prophecies of what God means and makes it possible for the dreamer to be, if he wakes to work towards that fair thing which shone on him from afar.
Cross-References (TSK)
Genesis 36:43; Genesis 37:2; Genesis 17:8; Genesis 23:4; Genesis 28:4; Genesis 36:7; Hebrews 11:9; Genesis 37:1; Genesis 37:5; Genesis 37:12; Genesis 37:21; Genesis 37:25; Genesis 37:29; Genesis 37:31; Genesis 37:36; Genesis 36:6; Genesis 36:8; Genesis 35:29; Genesis 35:4; Genesis 38:2; Genesis 47:27; Genesis 38:11; Exodus 6:4; Genesis 47:9; Genesis 42:7; Exodus 1:14