Ad Fontes ← Search Library Verse Index

John 18:1–19:42

The Passion of Christ — Trial Cross DeathTheme: Atonement / Suffering / ChristologyPericopeImportance: Major
Sources
Reformation Study BibleCalvin (1560)Geneva Bible Notes (1599)John Trapp (1647)John Gill (1748)Matthew Henry (1714)Jamieson-Fausset-BrownBarnes (1832)Cross-References (TSK)
Reformation Study Bible
This chapter has three sections. The arrest of Jesus is recorded in w. 1-18, the trial before Annas in w. 19-27, and the trial before Pilate in vv. 28-40. The accounts of the four Gospels cover the major events of the arrest, trial, execution, and resurrection of Jesus. While some difficulties arise in the correlation of details, the main elements are in complete harmony. Jesus was arrested at night. His trial before the Jewish authorities had at least two phases, and during this part of the trial Peter denied Jesus three times. The trial before secular powers had three phases, and Jesus was executed by Pilate’s soldiers. He was buried in Joseph of Arimathea's tomb, and on the first day of the week He arose from the dead and was seen alive in a variety of appearances to His disciples. None of the diffi- culties in the correlation of details is insuperable, but in a number of cases more than one explanation is possible, and in the absence of fuller data, it is difficult to choose among them. | officers from the chief priests. These were probably the same as the officers of 7:32, 45. They obviously expected resistance to the arrest, both from Jesus and His disciples. | knowing all... came forward and said to them. Note here, and at w, 7/and 11, that Jesus was ready to be arrested and tried. He made no attempt to escape what He had come to do. | | am he. Here we may have a simple identification, but “he” is supplied in the English text, so Jesus’ response coincides with a solemn name for God (“I am”) used in the Greek translation of the Old Testament in Ex. 3:14 (6:35 note). | let these men go. Even at this crucial time, Jesus was concerned for His disciples (17:12). | Peter... struck the high priest's servant. An ill-conceived act of resistance, John alone records that Peter carried the sword and that Malchus was the name of the servant; Luke alone records that Jesus healed him (Luke 22:51). | Put your sword into its sheath. Jesus’ rebuke does not concern the propriety of self-defense or civil resistance; the point is that Jesus has come to give His life a ransom for many, and He must not be dissuaded from this task (cf. Matt. 16:21-23). shall | not drink the cup. This “cup” is the cup of the wine of God's wrath (Ps, 75:8; Is. 51:17; Jer. 25:15-17, 27-38). The “cup” that Jesus chooses to drink is not merely death, but the wrath of God upon sin (cf. Matt. 20:22; Mark 10:38). | Annas. One of the most influential Jewish leaders of that age. Although deposed from the high priesthood by the Romans, he was still known by this title among the Jews. It is difficult to determine whether this verse and wv. 19-24 represent one or two phases of a trial before the Jewish authorities. Matthew, Mark, and Luke refer to an additional phase before the Sanhedrin. Judging from the description of rules for trials found in the Mishnah of some two hundred years later, the proceedings here were marked by serious irregularities and violations of Jewish law. The Sanhedrin was not supposed to meet at night; the death penalty could not be declared on the day of the trial; there was false evidence, and false witnesses were used (Matt. 26:59, 60); Jesus was exposed to blows from attendants during the trial (v. 22; Mark 14:65). In addition to all this, it was illegal for the Sanhedrin to meet for a capital case on the eve of a Sabbath or a feast day. These violations show that Jesus’ con- demnation by the Jewish authorities was a travesty of justice. | another disciple. Probably this was John since of the three clos- est to Jesus (Peter, James, and John), he is the only one not mentioned by name in the Gospel. known to the high priest. He was admitted to the palace, even allowed to invite a guest (v. 16). | The account of Peter's denial is interrupted in John’s Gospel by part of the trial proceedings (vv. 19-24). It would appear that there were three occasions of denial rather than three single sentences by Peter. This is what one would expect with a number of people coming and going and warming themselves by a fire. There may be different legitimate ways of distinguishing the occasions to yield the figure three predicted by Jesus (13:38). All four Gospels agree that the first denial was in response to a question of a “servant girl/’ in other words, a harmless per- son of no great importance in the household. 1am not. Peter's denial points out that when Jesus endures God's pun- ishment against sin, He does so without comfort or consolation. Peter's denial is foretold in Zech. 13:6, 7. Jesus’ solitude in His suffering is antici- pated in Ps. 69:20. | The high priest then questioned. This may be Annas or Caiaphas in the house of Annas (v, 24). An accused person was not to be ques- tioned until witnesses had first established a presumption of guilt. For this reason, some call this a hearing, not a trial. | one of the officers .. . struck Jesus. This obviously was highly irregular, particularly when the prisoner was bound (v. 24). | a relative. A question by this man endangered Peter more than the previous ones, since he might have wanted to avenge Malchus. | the governor's headquarters. The Roman trial of Jesus appears to have had three phases: an appearance before Pilate (vv. 28-38); an appearance before Herod (Luke 23:5-12); and a second appearance before Pilate (18:39-19:16), John describes only the first and third parts, but in more detail than the other Gospels. so that they would not be defiled. The Roman Praetorium was a site of hostility between the Romans and the Jews, and an unclean place for Jews. Remarkably, it is the place where they collaborated to put Jesus to death. See note on chs. 13-17. | What accusation. The Jews had no charge that would be recog- nized in a Roman court, let alone be viewed as a capital offense. | Take him yourselves and judge him. A logical response. Pilate’s point is that if they were not willing to specify charges, they should not expect Him to conduct a trial. ‘ not lawful for us to put anyone to death. This was the usual provision in countries occupied by Rome, perhaps in order to protect those who supported Rome. The Jews were not always so obedient; note the death of Stephen (Acts 7:57-60). | what kind of death. See 3:14; 12:32-34. Stoning was the Jewish method of capital punishment. Hanging and crucifixion, as implied in the words “lifted up,’ were used by the Romans. This shows the divine control over the whole procedure, even though it was marked by fla- grant injustice. | King of the Jews. Jesus was not the “King of the Jews” in the sense that He promoted sedition against Rome, as charged by the Jewish leaders (Luke 23:2), but He was the King of the Jews in the messianic sense (12:13; Matt. 2:2; Luke 1:32, 33; 19:38). | My kingdom is not of this world. Jesus is a King, but He will not establish His kingdom by force. This greatly puzzles Pilate. See “Jesus’ Heavenly Reign” at Acts 7:55. | You say. Pilate’s question elicits the marvelous answer of Jesus, whose kingdom and mission are founded in the truth (1:8, 14, 17; 8:32; 14:6). 18:38 What is truth. Truth does not matter to those who, like Pilate, are motivated by expediency. Likewise, truth does not matter to skeptics who have despaired of knowing it. Antioch® ovr Sidon, . Tyre » Damascus Sade ‘onus \e Memphis} ~ | Pelusium Z ARABIA EGYPT I find no guilt in him. Pilate finds no crime in Jesus and is reluctant to put Jesus to death. Ironically, it is the pagan Roman governor who tries to release Jesus, while “his own” (1:11) want Him to die. | you have a custom. The custom of pardoning a criminal at the Passover is relevant to the festival itself, which commemorates God's sparing the Israelites from death. | Barabbas. This name means “son of the father.’ Instead of him, the true Son of the Father died. | flogged him. The Roman scourge was cruel and sometimes fatal. The whip had metal or bone fragments in it to tear the flesh. Roman Control of Palestine at the Time of Christ. Following a successful military campaign against the Seleucids in 64 B.c., Pompey turned the Roman armies south- ward and took control of Jerusalem in 63 B.c. Initially the Roman army had been invited by some of the Jews to protect them from the Nabateans. Once the Romans became estab- lished in Palestine, they never left, despite repeated Jewish revolts against Roman control. Nineveh PA RTHIAN EMPIRE Ecbatana* -Seleucia © 1990 Thomas Nelson, Inc. | Behold the man. A natural way for Pilate to introduce the accused, but providentially a significant statement. Jesus is the last Adam, who sums up all that humanity could and should be. | the chief priests ... cried out. In their hatred of Jesus, the chief priests become the leaders of a mob. | find no guilt in him. For the third time Pilate proclaims Jesus’ inno- cence (18:38; 19:4; cf. Luke 23:4, 14, 22). | he ought to die. The appeal is to the charge of blasphemy, a capital offense in Jewish law (Lev. 24:16). | But Jesus gave him no answer. Jesus’ submission to arrest and trial is part of His surrender as a self-offering. | You would have no authority. Jesus acknowledges that the sov- ereign plan of God includes even the wickedness of His accusers and the cowardice of Pilate, See also the words of Peter (Acts 2:23) and the early church (Acts 4:28). | you are not Caesat’s friend. “Caesar's friend” was a recognized title for political supporters of the emperor. The Jews threaten Pilate with the suggestion that he will be considered a traitor to Rome if he releases someone who talks about being a king. | Preparation of the Passover. This is often understood to be the Thursday before Passover (Matt. 27:17 note). If so, John portrays Jesus being crucified at the same time as the Passover lambs (chs. 13-17 note). This appears to conflict with the record of the three Synoptic Gospels, where Jesus’ crucifixion occurs on Friday. Probably, the reference here is to Friday as the Preparation Day before the weekly Sabbath. Behold your King. To the last, Pilate refers to Jesus as the “King of the Jews." It may be that this was a last effort by Pilate to mollify the Jews, but if so, it failed. Later Pilate had this title affixed to the cross (v. 19). | no king but Caesar. They ignored or did not remember that God was their King. | they crucified him. See Matt. 27:32-37, two others. Two criminals were crucified at the same time as Jesus, in fulfillment of prophecy (Is. 53:12; Luke 22:37). This gave Christ the oppor- tunity to show His saving power by reaching out and rescuing a man at the very edge of eternity. | inscription. The four Gospels recount the inscription of Pilate with minute differences, perhaps because the inscription was in three lan- guages. John’s form, with the name “Jesus of Nazareth)" has a Semitic flavor. It was customary to attach an inscription stating the reason for execution. At the same time, Pilate’s notice was a public announcement of the kingship of Christ. | the chief priests .. . said. They viewed the inscription as an offense to their nation, and Pilate may have meant it that way—but he refused to change it. | tunic. Such tunics were not uncommon in the ancient world. The point is not the tunic’s value, but the depth of Jesus’ humiliation, from | by the cross. “Clopas” may be the same as “Cleopas,’ mentioned in Luke 24:18. The courage of the four women is noteworthy. Some are present again at Jesus’ burial (Matt. 27:61; Mark 15:47) and at the Resurrection (20:1-18; Matt. 28:1; Mark 16:1). | Woman, behold your son. “Woman” is not a harsh form of address in Aramaic (2:4 note). Even in the midst of dying on the cross as the Mediator of the new covenant, Jesus fulfills his duty as the Son of Mary in a splendid example of obedience to the letter and spirit of the fifth commandment. In a time of intense physical pain and mental anguish, the Lord thought of others, as is shown in the first statements from the cross (Luke 23:34, 43). | all .. . finished. The worst ordeal, that of bearing in the place of His people the wrath of God against sin (Matt. 27:46; Mark 15:34), appears to be over. | day of Preparation. See note on v. 14. bodies would not remain on the cross. This would ceremonially defile blood and water. John emphasizes this physical evidence that Jesus was a real human being and that He was dead, It has been suggested that rupture of the heart caused by extreme agony is indicated, but more recent medical research has shown that such trauma occurs only when the heart is already damaged by disease. Others see a symbolic signifi- cance linked with 1 John 5:6-8. | pierced his side with a spear. This act proves that Jesus was not in a coma but was dead, as shown by the burial preparations (vv, 39, 40) and the specification of a particular tomb (v, 41). Both the preserving of His bones (v. 33) and the piercing of His side fulfill Old Testament Scripture (vv. 36, 37; Ps. 34:20; Zech. 12:10). whom everything was taken as He offered Himself. It is also the fulfill- ment of Ps, 22:18. | Joseph of Arimathea. A secret supporter of Jesus mentioned in all four Gospels in connection with Jesus’ burial, but nowhere else in the New Testament. See note Luke 23:50, 51.
Calvin (1560)
John 18:1-6 1. When Jesus had spoken these words, he went out with his disciples over the brook Kedron, where was a garden, into which he entered, and his disciples. 2. And Judas also, who betrayed him, knew the place; for Jesus often resorted thither with his disciples. 3. Then Judas, having received a band of soldiers, and officers from the chief pricsts and Pharisees, came thither with lanterns, and torches, and weapons. 4. Now Jesus, knowing all the things which were coming upon him, went forward and said to them, Whom seek ye? 5. They answered him, Jesus of Nazareth. Jesus saith to them, It is I. And Judas also, who betrayed him, stood with them. 6. As soon therefore as he said to them, It is I, they went backward, and fell to the ground. 1. When Jesus bad spoken these words. In this narrative John passes by many things which the other three Evangelists relate, and he does so on purposej as his intention was to collect many things worthy of being recorded, about which they say nothing; and, therefore, let the reader go to the other Evangelists to find what is wanting here. Over the brook Kedron. In the Greek original there is an article prefixed to Kedron, which would seem to intimate that the brook takes its name from the cedars; [130] but this is probably an error which has crept into the text; for the valley or brook Kedron is often mentioned in Scripture. The place was so called from its being dark or gloomy, because, being a hollow valley, it was shady, [131] on that point, however, I do not dispute: I only state what is more probable. The chief thing to be considered is, the intention of the Evangelist in pointing out the place; for his object was, to show that Christ went to death willingly. He came into a place which, he knew, was well known to Judas. Why did he do this but to present himself, of his own accord, to the traitor and to the enemies? Nor was he led astray by inadvertency, for he knew beforehand all that was to happen. John afterwards mentions also that he went forward to meet them. He therefore suffered death, not by constraint, but willingly, that he might be a voluntary sacrifice; for without obedience atonement would not have been obtained for us. Besides, he entered into the garden, not for the purpose of seeking a place of concealment, but that he might have a better opportunity, and greater leisure, for prayer. That he prayed three times to be delivered from death, ( Matthew 26:44 ,) is not inconsistent with that voluntary obedience of which we have spoken; [132] for it was necessary that he should contend with difficulties, that he might be victorious. Now, having subdued the dread of death, he advances to death freely and willingly. 3. Judas, therefore, having received a band of soldiers. That Judas came accompanied by soldiers and by so large a retinue, is a sign of a bad conscience, which always trembles without any cause. It is certain that the band of soldiers was borrowed from the governor, who also sent a captain at the head of a thousand soldiers; for, on account of sudden mutinies, a garrison was stationed in the city, and the governor himself kept a body-guard, wherever he was. The rest were officers sent by the priests; but John makes separate mention of the Pharisee, because they were more enraged than all the rest, as if they had cared more about religion. 4. Jesus therefore, hnowing. The Evangelist states more clearly with what readiness Christ went forward to death, but, at the same time, describes the great power which he exercised by a single word, in order to inform us that wicked men had no power over him, except so far as he gave permission. 5. It is I. He replies mildly that he is the person whom they seek, and yet, as if they had been struck down by a violent tempest, or rather by a thunderbolt, he lays them prostrate on the ground. There was no want of power in him, therefore, to restrain their hands, if he had thought proper; but he wished to obey his Father, by whose decree he knew that he was called to die. We may infer from this how dreadful and alarming to the wicked the voicc of Christ will be, when he shall ascend his throne to judge the world. At that time he stood as a lamb ready to be sacrificed; his majesty, so far as outward appearance was concerned, was utterly gone; and yet when he utters but a single word, his armed and courageous enemies fall down. And what was the word? He thunders no fearful excommunication against them, but only replies, It is I What then will be the result, when he shall come, not to be judged by a man, but to be the Judge of the living and the dead; not in that mean and despicable appearance but shining in heavenly glory, and accompanied by his angels? He intended, at that time, to give a proof of that efficacy which Isaiah ascribes to his voice. Among other glorious attributes of Christ, the Prophet relates that he will strike the earth with the rod of his mouth, and will slay the wicked by the breath of his lips, ( Isaiah 11:4 .) True, the fulfillment of this prophecy is declared by Paul to be delayed till the end of the world, ( 2 Thessalonians 2:8 .) Yet we daily see the wicked, with all their rage and pride, struck down by the voice of Christ; and, when those men fell down who had come to bind Christ, there was exhibited a visible token of that alarm which wicked men feel within themselves, whether they will or not, when Christ speaks by his ministers. Besides, as this was in some measure accidental to the voice of Christ, to whom it peculiarly belongs to raise up men who were lying in a state of death, he will undoubtedly display toward us such power as to raise us even to heaven. Footnotes: [130] Is Kedron, a proper name, or an appellative? Calvin does not mean that the presence of the article settles this question, but that it depends on the preference which shall be given to one or another of the various readings. If we read ton Kedron, it will be difficult to resist the conclusion that Kedron is the genitive plural of Kedros, a cedar; but if we read tou Kedron, or rather, tou Kedron, we must treat Kedron, as an indeclinable Hebrew word, though Josephus chooses sometimes to decline it, as in the phrase, cheimarron Kedronos, the brook of Kedron, (Ant. 8:1.) "Instead of the common reading, ton Kedron," says Bloomfield, "four of the most ancient MSS. and six ancient Versions, with some Fathers, have,tou Kedron, which was preferred by Beza, Casaubon, Campbell, Castalio, Drusius, Lightfoot, Bols, Bynmus, Reland, and others of the best Commentators down to Middleton, Kuinoel, and Tittmann, and has been received by Bengel, Griesbach, Knapp, Vater, and Scholz. The common reading, however, is strenuously, but not satisfactorily, defended by Lampe and Matthsei." Our Author proceeds no further than to propose, tou instead of ton, as a conjectural emendation; but Bloomfield has given a prodigious list of authorities on the same side. -- Ed. [131] The Hebrew name qdrvn (Kidron) is derived from qdr, (Kadar,) it was black, and signifies the black brook. -- Ed. [132] On this point the reader will do well to consult our Author's elaborate exposition and argument, Harmony of the Evangelists, [10]vol. 3, pp. 226-234.
Geneva Bible Notes (1599)
When {1} Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples. (1) Christ goes of his own accord into a garden, which his betrayer knew, to be taken, so that by his obedience he might take away the sin that entered into the world by one man's rebellion, and that in a garden.
John Trapp (1647)
When Jesus had spoken these words, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron, where was a garden, into the which he entered, and his disciples. Over the brook Cedron — This was the town ditch, 2 Chronicles 30:14 , and had its name from its darkness or muddiness; for it received the baggage, as a common sink. Not far from hence was the valley of Hinnom, wherein there was kept a continual fire for the burning of dead carcases and other garbage, as Kimchi notes upon Psalms 27:0 . Hence hell is called Gehenna.
John Gill (1748)
When Jesus had spoken these words,.... Referring either to his discourses in John 14:1 , in which he acquaints his disciples with his approaching death; comforts them under the sorrowful apprehension of his departure from them; gives them many excellent promises for their relief, and very wholesome advice how to conduct themselves; lets them know what should befall them, and that things, however distressing for the present, would have a joyful issue: or else to his prayer in the preceding chapter, in which he had been very importunate with his Father, both for himself and his disciples; or to both of these, which is highly probable: he went forth with his disciples over the brook Cedron; the same with "Kidron" in 2 Samuel 15:23 ; and elsewhere: it had its name, not from cedars, for not cedars but olives chiefly grew upon the mount, which was near it; and besides the name is not Greek, but Hebrew, though the Arabic version renders it, "the brook" , "of Cedar": it had its name either from the darkness of the valley in which it ran, being between high mountains, and having gardens in it, and set with trees; or from the blackness of the water through the soil that ran into it, being a kind of a common sewer, into which the Jews cast everything that was unclean and defiling; see 2 Chronicles 29:16 . Particularly there was a canal which led from the altar in the temple to it, by which the blood and soil of the sacrifices were carried into it (m). This brook was but about three feet over from bank to bank, and in the summer time was quite dry, and might be walked over dry shod; and is therefore by Josephus sometimes called the brook of Kidron (n), and sometimes the valley of Kidron (o): in this valley were corn fields; for hither the sanhedrim sent their messengers to reap the sheaf of the firstfruits, which always was to be brought from a place near to Jerusalem (p); and it is very likely that willows grew by the brook, from whence they might fetch their willow branches at the feast of tabernacles; for the Jews say (q), there is a place below Jerusalem called Motza, (in the Gemara it is said to be Klamia or Colonia,) whither they went down and gathered willow branches; it seems to be the valley of Kidron, which lay on the east of Jerusalem, between that and the Mount of Olives (r); it had fields and gardens adjoining to it; see 2 Kings 23:4 . So we read of a garden here, into which Christ immediately went, when he passed over this brook. The blood, the filth and soil of it, which so discoloured the water, as to give it the name of the Black Brook, used to be sold to the gardeners to dung their gardens with (s). It was an emblem of this world, and the darkness and filthiness of it, and of the exercises and troubles of the people of God in it, which lie in the way to the heavenly paradise and Mount of Zion, through which Christ himself went, drinking "of the brook in the way", Psalm 110:7 ; and through which also all his disciples and followers enter into the kingdom of heaven: it may also be a figure of the dark valley of the shadow of death, through which Christ and all his members pass to the heavenly glory. And I see not why this black and unclean brook may not be a representation of the pollutions and defilements of sin; which being laid on Christ when he passed over it, made him so heavy and sore amazed in the human nature, as to desire the cup might pass from him. Once more let it be observed, that it was the brook David passed over when he fled from his son Absalom; in this David was a type of Christ, as in other things: Absalom represented the people of the Jews, who rejected the Messiah, and rebelled against him; Ahithophel, Judas, who betrayed him; and the people that went with David over it, the disciples of our Lord; only there was this difference; there was a father fleeing from a son, here a son going to meet his father's wrath; David and his people wept when they went over this brook, but so did not Christ and his disciples; the sorrowful scene to them both began afterwards in the garden. This black brook and dark valley, and it being very late at night when it was passed over, all add to that dark dispensation, that hour of darkness, which now came upon our Lord; yet he went forth over it of his own accord, willingly and cheerfully; not being forced or compelled by any; and his disciples with him, not to be partners of his sufferings, but to be witnesses of them, and to receive some knowledge and instruction from what they should see and hear: where was a garden into which he entered; and his disciples: there were no orchards nor gardens within the city of Jerusalem, but rose gardens, which were from the times of the prophets (t); all others were without; and this was a very proper place for gardens, where so much dung was near at hand. Whether this garden belonged to one of Christ's friends, is not certain; but since he often resorted hither, no doubt it was with the leave, and by the consent of the proprietor of it. However, so it was, that as the first Adam's disobedience was committed in a garden, the second. Adam's obedience to death for sin, began here; and as the sentence of death, on account of sin, was passed in a garden, it began to be executed in one. (m) Misn. Middot, c. 3. sect. 2. Meila, c. 3. sect. 3. & Bartenora in ib. Maimon. & Bartenora in Misn. Zebachim, c. 8. 7. & Temura, c. 7. sect. 6. (n) Antiqu. l. 8. c. 1. sect. 5. (o) Ib. l. 9. c. 7. sect. 3. & de Bello Jud. l. 5. c. 4. sect. 2. & c. 6. sect. 1.((p) Misna Menachot, c. 10. sect. 2, 3.((q) Misna Succa, c. 4. sect. 5. (r) Jerom de locis Hebraicis, fol. 92. C. (s) Misn. Yoma, c. 5. sect 6. Maimon. Meila, c. 2. sect. 11. (t) T. Bab. Bava Kama, fol. 82. 2. Abot. R. Nathan, c. 35. Maimon. Beth Habbechira, c. 7. sect. 14. Moses Kotsensis Mitzvot Torn praecept. Aff. 164.
Matthew Henry (1714)
Sin began in the garden of Eden, there the curse was pronounced, there the Redeemer was promised; and in a garden that promised Seed entered into conflict with the old serpent. Christ was buried also in a garden. Let us, when we walk in our gardens, take occasion from thence to mediate on Christ's sufferings in a garden. Our Lord Jesus, knowing all things that should come upon him, went forth and asked, Whom seek ye? When the people would have forced him to a crown, he withdrew, ch.
Jamieson-Fausset-Brown
CHAPTER 18 Joh 18:1-13. Betrayal and Apprehension of Jesus. 1-3. over the brook Kedron—a deep, dark ravine, to the northeast of Jerusalem, through which flowed this small storm brook or winter torrent, and which in summer is dried up. where was a garden—at the foot of the Mount of Olives, "called Gethsemane; that is, olive press (Mt 26:30, 36). John 18:1-9 Judas betrayeth Jesus: the officers and soldiers at Christ’s word fall to the ground. John 18:10 ,11 Peter cutteth off Malchus’s ear. John 18:12-14 Jesus is led bound to Annas and Caiaphas. John 18:15-18 Peter denieth him. John 18:19-24 Jesus is examined by the high priest, and struck by one of the officers. John 18:25-27 Peter denieth him the second and third time. John 18:28-40 Jesus, brought before Pilate, and examined, confesses his kingdom not to be of this world; Pilate, testifying his innocence, and offering to release him, the Jews prefer Barabbas. Chapter Introduction Having so largely discoursed the history of our Saviour’s passion, See Poole on " Matthew 26:1 " , and following verses to Matthew 26:71 , See Poole on " Matthew 27:1 " , and following verses to Matthew 27:66 , where (to make the history entire) we compared what the other evangelists also have about it; I shall refer the reader to the notes upon those two chapters, and be the shorter in the notes upon this and the following chapters. Matthew hath nothing of those discourses, and prayer, which we have had in the four last chapters; no more have any of the other evangelists, who yet all mention his going into the mount of Olives, after his celebration of his last supper, Matthew 26:30 Mark 14:26 Luke 22:39 . Our evangelist saith, he went over the brook Cedron into a garden. The others say nothing of a garden, but mention his coming to a place called Gethsemane. It is probable that this village was at the foot of Mount Olivet; and the garden mentioned was a garden near that village, and belonging to it (for they had not their gardens within their towns, but without): now the way to this was over the brook Cedron; of which brook we read, 2 Samuel 15:23 ; David passed over it when he fled from Absalom; and 1 Kings 2:37 , where it is mentioned as Shimei’s limit, which he might not pass. This brook was in the way towards the mount of Olives; which being passed, he with his disciples went into a garden belonging to the town Gethsemane.
Barnes (1832)
The brook Cedron - This was a small stream that flowed to the east of Jerusalem, through the valley of Jehoshaphat, and divided the city from the Mount of Olives. It was also called Kidron and Kedron. In summer it is almost dry. The word used here by the evangelist - χειμάῤῥου cheimarrou - denotes properly a water-stream (from χεῖρμα cheimōn, shower or water, and ῥέω reō, ῥόος roos, to flow, flowing), and the idea is that of a stream that was swollen by rain or by the melting of the snow (Passow, Lexicon). This small rivulet runs along on the east of Jerusalem until it is joined by the water of the pool of Siloam, and the water that flows down on the west side of the city through the valley of Jehoshaphat, and then goes off in a southeast direction to the Dead Sea. (See the map of the environs of Jerusalem.) Over this brook David passed when he fled from Absalom, 2 Samuel 15:23 . It is often mentioned in the Old Testament, 1 Kings 15:13 ; 2 Chronicles 15:16 ; 2 Chronicles 30:14 ; 2 Kings 23:6 , 2 Kings 23:12 . Where was a garden - On the west side of the Mount of Olives. This was called Gethsemane. See the notes at Matthew 26:36 . It is probable that this was the property of some wealthy man in Jerusalem - perhaps some friend of the Saviour. It was customary for the rich in great cities to have country-seats in the vicinity. This, it seems, was so accessible that Jesus was accustomed to visit it, and yet so retired as to be a suitable place for devotion.
Cross-References (TSK)
John 13:31; John 14:1; John 14:31; Matthew 26:36; Mark 14:32; Luke 22:39; 2 Samuel 15:23; 1 Kings 15:13; 2 Kings 23:6; 2 Chronicles 15:16; 2 Chronicles 30:14; Jeremiah 31:40; John 18:26; Genesis 2:15; Genesis 3:23